[address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Mon Aug 12 10:01:57 CEST 2019
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019, at 10:59, Nick Hilliard wrote: > I agree with Wolfgang - the current version is fine, and Gert - that it > is important to move on this because otherwise we'll lose the > opportunity forever, and that would be a shame because IXPs perform an > important function for the Internet as a whole. +1 We should go on with the current version. *IF* you consider that lowering the default to /25 is really necesarry, you can still submit a new proposal for thay, AFTER the current one is ik and the extra space secured. -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]