[address-policy-wg] What we want to be acceptable in IPv4 PI and IPv6 PI?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] What we want to be acceptable in IPv4 PI and IPv6 PI?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] country code in ORGANISATION object
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aleksey Bulgakov
aleksbulgakov at gmail.com
Wed Oct 17 17:12:13 CEST 2018
>We should stop caring about IPv4 PI, as that is long gone. And about IPv4 PA and stop to help RIPE to earn money. :) ср, 17 окт. 2018 г., 16:12 Gert Doering <gert at space.net>: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:08:49PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via > address-policy-wg wrote: > > Trying to look into my presentation today from a higher-level > perspective ... > > > > What is the expected usage of IPv4 and IPv6 PI? > > We should stop caring about IPv4 PI, as that is long gone. > > So the focus needs to be "what is an IPv6 PI policy that is useful for > the RIPE region". > > Wether or not this is the same as what we had for IPv4 in the past is > only of historic relevance. > > Gert Doering > -- APWG chair > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael > Emmer > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20181017/f0736a4f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] What we want to be acceptable in IPv4 PI and IPv6 PI?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] country code in ORGANISATION object
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]