[address-policy-wg] Policies and Guidelines for Assignments for Network Infrastructure and End User Networks
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policies and Guidelines for Assignments for Network Infrastructure and End User Networks
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policies and Guidelines for Assignments for Network Infrastructure and End User Networks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Mon Nov 5 11:50:26 CET 2018
Töma Gavrichenkov wrote on 05/11/2018 10:36: > But when we try to rely on6.2 for a definitive advice, we don't get any: The general practice is to treat /30-/32 as LIR infrastructure assignments, i.e. not register them. /29s are borderline - there are cases where a /29 could be considered as a point-to-point link, e.g. single customer address + VRRP config on routers. Ambiguity allows common sense to be used. There is a bigger issue of whether personal information should be exposed in public whois for any resource registration. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policies and Guidelines for Assignments for Network Infrastructure and End User Networks
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policies and Guidelines for Assignments for Network Infrastructure and End User Networks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]