[address-policy-wg] [Ext] Re: proposal to remove IPv6 PI
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ext] Re: proposal to remove IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ext] Re: proposal to remove IPv6 PI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Mon May 21 21:54:40 CEST 2018
Hi Gert, On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 05:12:45PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: >Especially in the government and enterprise market, there's other models >today, like "the government LIR holds a /26, each region in a country >has a /32 out of that, and each region is free to pick their own ISP >to have the /32 routed". Right. So all that is needed to dispose of PIv6 is to make these /32s portable and perhaps a change in additional allocation calculations in order to let the LIR get more resources if the existing (sub-allocated) resources are not sufficiently utilized. rgds, Sascha Luck > >(The impact to the routing table is is about the same as "each region >has their own LIR", but for internal administrative reasons these setups >prefer to have a common address space for all official networks...) > >Gert Doering > -- APWG chair >-- >have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > >SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer >Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann >D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) >Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ext] Re: proposal to remove IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ext] Re: proposal to remove IPv6 PI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]