[address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI

Hi,

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 02:52:57PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote:
> 2) It was clear in the meeting, as we *all* know, that many folks in the community (and not only in this region) are abusing the policy and they actually use end-user space (PI policies) to *assign* (call it sub-assign if you prefer it), to third parties.

In IPv4, the PI policy is different and explicitely allows numbering of
transit networks to customer sites (= "my router and their router") from
PI space.  So running an ISP on PI space is *not* "abusing the policy".

Which has been pointed out quite a few times in APWG sessions and nobody 
saw the need to go for a change here (and since IPv4 PI is now gone, I'm not 
sure it's a useful usage of the WG's time to spend it on IPv4 PI)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20180516/ffa416cb/attachment.sig>