[address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed May 16 16:11:24 CEST 2018
Hi, On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 02:52:57PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote: > 2) It was clear in the meeting, as we *all* know, that many folks in the community (and not only in this region) are abusing the policy and they actually use end-user space (PI policies) to *assign* (call it sub-assign if you prefer it), to third parties. In IPv4, the PI policy is different and explicitely allows numbering of transit networks to customer sites (= "my router and their router") from PI space. So running an ISP on PI space is *not* "abusing the policy". Which has been pointed out quite a few times in APWG sessions and nobody saw the need to go for a change here (and since IPv4 PI is now gone, I'm not sure it's a useful usage of the WG's time to spend it on IPv4 PI) Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20180516/ffa416cb/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]