[address-policy-wg] inputs on possible policy proposal for IPv6

* JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> [2018-05-02 14:26]:
> Note that in the case of RIPE, we have a big difference with the
> other RIRs, because all them start with /32, while we updated our
> policy several years ago (because 6rd deployment), to allocated /29.
> This means that if we go for this policy, it will be justified to
> "upgrade" all the /29 allocations to a /28.

Hi,

I'm not sure I see the big benefit of upgrading to a /28 but on a
purely technical standpoint, "upgrading" is not possible in most cases
because RIPE NCC did not reserve a complete /28 for every LIR. So you
would end up with two /29 or you'd have to renumber your /29 to a new
/28.

Both options don't sound appealing to me.

Regards

Sebastian

-- 
GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A  9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE)
'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE.
            -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 614 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20180504/36325afd/attachment.sig>