[address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Jan 16 12:22:05 CET 2018
> On 16 Jan 2018, at 11:11, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> wrote: > > That's because I don't think that "rough consensus" is primarily about > how many supporters a proposal has, I think it's about primarily about > the nature and quality of the objection. Indeed. And how those objections were considered/addressed/resolved. > this can only be a discussion of principles and norms, it can never be turned into a rigid > set of rules. This model will always rest heavily on the judgment of the Chairs. I'm OK with that. Me too.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]