[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 To Last Call (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 To Last Call (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Mon Jan 15 12:17:14 CET 2018
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote: > Obviously, I don’t agree, just because for me, “consensus” is having > no objections, not a “democracy voting”. APWG aims to follow the IETF approach to consensus, as defined in rfc7282. This explicitly allows for consensus to be declared even if there are outstanding objections. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 To Last Call (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]