[address-policy-wg] 2018-03 Last Call for Comments (Fixing Outdated Information in the IPv4 Policy)

May we do it for 2015-01? For example it would help to switch to IPv6, but
the NCC wants to earn money and don't think about the community. :)

(Technically, it could still run through an appeals process, though the
question is "what for?" since nobody had any objections)


чт, 30 Авг 2018 г., 16:26 Gert Doering <gert at space.net>:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:55:52PM -0700, Elvis Daniel Velea wrote:
> > while this was more of a cosmetic change and while this proposal did
> > have support an no objections, I think that 4-5 e-mails of support
> > should have at least required an extended discussion/review phase.
>
> This is a statement that should have been voiced after Erik's summary
> at the end of the review phase (and I do agree in principle that
> "more voices of support" would have been welcome).
>
> *Now* is too late for the WG chairs to do anything about it.  The PDP for
> this proposal has concluded.
>
> (Technically, it could still run through an appeals process, though the
> question is "what for?" since nobody had any objections)
>
>
> > Especially since in last call nobody said a word.
>
> Last call does not require anyone to say anything.  This is stated
> very explicitely in the PDP.
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- NetMaster
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael
> Emmer
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20180830/6e2d6ef7/attachment.html>