[address-policy-wg] 2018-03 Last Call for Comments (Fixing Outdated Information in the IPv4 Policy)

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 07:20:07AM +0300, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote:
> But is there any reasons to comment something? We did it for 2015-01, but
> you declared consensus.

The mail where I declared consensus had a summary and detailed reasoning
why decisions were made.  That certain people did not like 2015-01 because
it broke their business model of requesting and quickly selling off /22s
is understandable, but that was the whole point of the change - so yes,
the community ignored those complaints.

You know quite well that the WG chairs look very closely at the discussion
and see if there is enough support to call it "rough consensus" or not
(and either send the proposal back, or extent the discussion/review phase)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20180829/3495589c/attachment.sig>