[address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)

This proposal will increase per-IP price
Thus, it will promote alternatives (IPv6 !)

Today at $work, there is nothing planned to get rid of IPv4. Why should
we ? Buying some is less expensive than working on hybrid solution.

On 22/09/2017 13:04, Jetten Raymond wrote:
> I seriously think that the more time we get,  or give the illusion that we can then rearrange it again, the more time people will ignore the fact that it will run out, regardless if we change the policy or not.




-- 
Jack
Net/sys admin

More details about KWAOO can be found at:
https://as24904.kwaoo.net/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20170922/39f79bfd/attachment.sig>