[address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu Sep 21 21:18:51 CEST 2017
> You're correct in saying that APWG does not deal with pricing, but > it's a bit jesuitical not to acknowledge that the practical impact of > this policy change will be a dramatic increase in RIR-allocated ipv4 > addresses. someone wrote to me saying the same thing. but they added that the current situation has ripe selling a public good at radically below market pricing and that this has resulted in some very asocial behavior with bad long term effects. >> but we can postpone the inevitable so folk have time to get in >> the lifeboats. > There is no amount of time that will be enough. yes. but v6 is slowly catching on, and we do what we can to make the internet a better place. there is no perfect. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]