[address-policy-wg] IXP peering lan reachability

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IXP peering lan reachability
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IXP peering lan reachability

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rob Evans rhe at nosc.ja.net
Tue Oct 24 12:18:02 CEST 2017

> I'd politely suggest that this is an area that the RIPE NCC should not
> get involved in, especially from the point of view of implicitly issuing
> recommended practice by implying that there is a problem with doing
> this.  The IXP associations are better placed to gather consensus for
> creating best practices, and there is no general consensus in the IXP
> community on this issue.

Full agreement with Nick, the (controlled) announcement or otherwise
of an IXP prefix is not a registry policy issue.

Cheers,
Rob

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IXP peering lan reachability
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IXP peering lan reachability

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ address-policy-wg Archives ]