[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase Extended (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)

Hi James,
Hi all,

James Blessing wrote at 27.11.2017 13:32:

> The only open question I see is if the examples included in the wording
> are broad enough in terms of scope to enable a clear decision as to
> whether a "usage" is (or is not) a sub-assignment? For me it's clear but
> I'm a native bad english speaker and would appreciate confirmation from
> non-native speakers just to make sure

As being a bad non-native english speaker it is clear to me that the
usage of an PI IPv6 address through one of your endusers on your own
infrastructe is clearly not a sub-assigment.

As Max stated out even RIPE NCC had to use addresses from a PI
Assignment on serveral RIPE-Meetings to supply IPv6 addresses to the
attendees of the meetings.

So it is pretty clear to me that i, as a attendee, was using RIPE-NCC
infrastructue and not asking RIPE NCC for an IPv6 sub-assignment of
their PI-Space.

Best Regards.

Matthias Kluth

Senior Network Consultant

HeLi NET Telekommunikation GmbH & Co. KG
Hafenstr. 80-82
D-59067 Hamm

Tel.: +49 (0)2381 / 874-4502
Fax: +49 (0)2381 / 874-4551
Mobil: +49 (0)173 / 5411102
Email: mk at helinet.de
Web: http://www.helinet.de
-- 
HeLi NET Telekommunikation GmbH & Co. KG
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamm - Amtsgericht Hamm HRA 1881
Komplementaerin: HeLi NET Verwaltung GmbH
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamm - Amtsgericht Hamm HRB 2781
Geschaeftsfuehrung:  Dipl.-Kfm. Ralf Schuette