[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase *extended* (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase *extended* (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase *extended* (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sebastian Becker
sb at lab.dtag.de
Sun Nov 26 13:14:14 CET 2017
Same here! I strongly agree to and the solution as proposed by Max in 2016-04 in his latest version is fine for me. — Sebastian Becker > Am 25.11.2017 um 22:13 schrieb Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist at gmail.com>: > > I strongly agree with the intention and am fine with the proposed solution. > > Richard > > Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity and the wall of text Gmail appends by default. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20171126/8fa5040e/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase *extended* (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase *extended* (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]