[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Nov 8 18:55:59 CET 2017
Hi, On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:48:42PM +0100, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote: > [...] > > I feel that the current version is solving partially Max case, but even in his case, if he decides to provide /64 for each hot-spot customer, this proposal will not work. > > Actually the NCC IA interpretation is rather clear on this one - as > Marco (IIRC) confirmed while the WG session. /64 assignments to hosts > aren't a problem with the current policy text / interpretation. Precision of language: "... with the proposed new policy text". (Sorry to be nit-picking here) gert -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20171108/7dc9f912/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]