[address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Thu Mar 23 23:41:43 CET 2017
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 07:34:05PM +0100, Martin Hun?k wrote: >So why don't do some "hidden" flag part of asnum object? > >Let say that, end user (MNT) would be able to indicate that ASN >should be hidden from the BGP and provide remarks for a reason >(IXP or whatever) - mandatory. If such ASN would be observed in >the BGP, the hidden flag would be unset and LIR/holder would be >notified. What purpose would that serve apart from satisfying idle curiosity? The reasons why an ASN is not advertised are of concern only to the operator of that ASN. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]