[address-policy-wg] 2016-05 I agree
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-05 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Synchronising the Initial and Subsequent IPv6 Allocation Policies)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-05 I agree
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frank Meyer
meyer at it-nds.de
Sat Feb 4 10:27:25 CET 2017
Hello, I agree to 2016-05 ! Why having 2 different policies for the same thing? - Two policies cause overhead and double effort. - Different policies punish early birds in ipv6 deployment. So let us synchronise the policies. Best regards! Frank lir de.government sub lir Niedersachsen
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-05 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Synchronising the Initial and Subsequent IPv6 Allocation Policies)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-05 I agree
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]