[address-policy-wg] Idea for aggregating IP addresses
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Idea for aggregating IP addresses
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Idea for aggregating IP addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mozafary Mohammad
mozafary at greenweb.ir
Thu Sep 22 14:43:43 CEST 2016
Hello The suggestion help IP broker to made bigger IP block and earn more money. bigger IP block is more expensive than smaller one. :) Also why RIPE NCC should return "Spam dirty" IP range and assign new one to a user? Thanks On 9/22/2016 4:07 PM, Ping IP wrote: > Hello, > > One of the goals of RIPE is to aggregate IP addresses. I'd like to > suggest the ability for a LIR and End User to exchange number of > blocks of IP ranges for a greater block. > > For example: > LIR/End User has 4 different /22 subnets and LIR/End User can exchange > these subnets for 1 x /20 subnet. > > This gives a LIR or End User the possibility to announce larger IP > subnets to the Internet. Helping the goal of aggregating the IP > addresses on the Internet. > > According one of the RIPE trainer, this is currently not possible > according the RIPE policy. Because there's no policy to give a LIR/End > User this ability. > > I'm curious to what you think of this idea. > > Best regards, > > Abdelouahed > Ping IP network -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160922/57b67010/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Idea for aggregating IP addresses
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Idea for aggregating IP addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]