[address-policy-wg] even more off-topic stuff (was: 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

Hi,

On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 09:25:07PM +0300, Plesa Niculae wrote:
> > On 20 Oct 2016, at 10:42, Plesa Niculae <niculae at plesa.ro> wrote:
> > 
> > I strongly believe that we should have this conversation public. You switch it to private, for the reason I don???t understand, because we have nothing to hide and nobody to protect, I kindly ask you to make it public.

The sole purpose of the address-policy mailing list is to discuss
*address policy*.

The noise level on this list sometimes gets very high, so people that
are interested in *policy making* (and not in personal attacks) complain 
to the chairs that we need to keep it more focused - and that's what
Sander tried to: take the discussion offline, so your points are
answered, but do not contribute to the noise level.

Your mail has nothing to do whatsoever with the policy proposals currently
under discussion, and so this was a very reasonable request.


If you insist on sending stuff to the list that is not related to the
policy proposals under discussion, *at least* be polite enough to those
readers that are interested in discussions to change the Subject: so
it's clear that your mails are not related to 2016-03.

thanks,

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20161023/89c2977e/attachment.sig>