[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Riccardo Gori
rgori at wirem.net
Sat Oct 22 06:26:40 CEST 2016
Hi list, I support this proposal. It's seems logical and needed modify. Simple and easy clarification to avoid misunderstading in interpretation. Well done thank you Max. I realized that I was proposing sort of this to one of my customers just before summer season 2016 for beach side public wifi. Project postponed to summer season 2017 for technical reasons. I would copy the "Contractual requirements" under "New Policy Text" since like this seems to be part of the modify. regards Riccardo Il 21/10/2016 10:15, Marco Schmidt ha scritto: > Dear colleagues, > > A new RIPE Policy proposal 2016-04, "IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification" > is now available for discussion. > > The goal of this proposal is to define sub-assignments in IPv6 PI assignments as subnets of /64 and shorter. > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-04 > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 21 November 2016. > > Regards, > > Marco Schmidt > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC > > Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum > -- Riccardo Gori
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]