[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Maximilian Wilhelm
max at rfc2324.org
Fri Oct 21 18:19:50 CEST 2016
Anno domini 2016 David Croft scripsit: > On 21 October 2016 at 12:55, Maximilian Wilhelm <max at rfc2324.org> wrote: > > Anno domini 2016 David Croft scripsit: > >> I note that the "New policy text" does not specify the replacement > >> text for the "Contractual Requirements" > > > > That doesn't seem neccessary as the point in question - the definiton > > of a sub-assignment - is specified in the new version of ripe-655. > > > > What are you missing? > > It appears in the "Current policy text" section, which implied that it > was going to be changed in the "New policy text" section, but I guess > it's just there for context then. Yes, indeed. I quoted that part as it is relavant context for the change and holds the point in questions. Best Max -- "Wer nicht mehr liebt und nicht mehr irrt, der lasse sich begraben." -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]