[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mozafary Mohammad
mozafary at greenweb.ir
Thu Oct 20 07:17:20 CEST 2016
Your last line is most likely section of your email. On 10/19/2016 8:36 PM, Plesa Niculae wrote: > Dear all, > I saw a lot of members and/or staff friends supporting one another in > judging Ciprian metaphors, hyperbolas and comparisons and no one > answering to the *FACTS* presented by him, and to the *real life > experienced problems* that he raised. > Everybody was disgusted when hearing about Hitler, Nazi or Camps and > nobody has noticed that Ciprian *only answers* to disgusting words > addressed to him, like: *SHUT-UP!* Somebody said to Aleksey this > morning that he speaks bullshit and nobody complain about that language! > So it became obvious for me that friends from/of OUR organisation > stick together in shutting down everybody else with another opinion, > fighting back on the figures of speech, not on the essence of the > problems. > I almost feel obliged to take a stand and to warn everybody that what > happens with cross firing Ciprian for no other real reason than his > colourful way of speaking is *I N C O R R E C T *! I feel also obliged > to thank very much to the ones not blinded by the fury attacks of the > policy change initiators on the ones with different opinions than > theirs and only focused on the real matters that Aleksey, Ciprian, > Patrick, Daniel, Radu-Adrian, Lu and others raised up. > I have to say that I am totally agree with the real and important > problems of the policy raised by Ciprian and other members. I am > against changing the existing policy. By attacking Ciprian you will > not solve the problems of the policy and by ignoring the fact that the > wg chairs have businesses in which they use the current policy in > transferring IPs and after that they want to modify the policy as soon > as possible and with insufficient debates and insufficient quorum > raises a HUGE question mark. > Best Regards, > Niculae Plesa > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20161020/081d5f6a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]