[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Thu Oct 20 06:54:40 CEST 2016
On 19/10/2016 16:37, Ciprian Nica wrote: Gert, Whatever proposal(s) Ciprian supports considers my vote as a "-1". -Hank > The usual reply when somebody says something here is "shut up" and > "unsubscribe" ? Really ? I think I could talk more freely in Kremlin > than here. > > Yes, the noise is what Gert did 2 years ago. Let's get over it and > discuss what is really important. > > Please express your support for the two important ideas which are > "let's ignore the minority because that's what minority does, it's > simply against the majority" and "let's ignore people we don't like". > Maybe we can set up some criteria for that ? Send your "+1" for the > two ideas if you support them. There's no need for praising Gert > anymore. I got the idea, he's one of the beloved sons of RIPE community. > > Ciprian > > > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Roger Jørgensen <rogerj at gmail.com > <mailto:rogerj at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Ciprian Nica, > > If you have a problem with someone, or claim someone is abusing > something > take it up with RIPE NCC. NOT THIS LIST! > > Can you please for now just shut up with your noise? > > > > > Chair/RIPE NCC/whoever, > > can someone consider if there is reason to actual give Ciprian a > warning and > possible forced unsub? > > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Ciprian Nica <office at ip-broker.uk > <mailto:office at ip-broker.uk>> wrote: > > > >> > >> I guess we need the board of RIPE NCC to once in a while step > up and > >> block things when > >> they see clear abuse. > > > > > > Here is the fact: > > > > % Version 1 of object "185.54.120.0 - 185.54.123.255" > > > > % This version was a UPDATE operation on 2014-04-17 16:59 > > > > % You can use "--list-versions" to get a list of versions for an > object. > > > > > > inetnum: 185.54.120.0 - 185.54.123.255 > > > > netname: DE-TRANSNET-20140417 > > > > descr: TRANSNET Internet Services GmbH > > > > country: DE > > > > org: ORG-TA16-RIPE > > > > > > % Version 2 of object "185.54.120.0 - 185.54.123.255" > > > > % This version was a UPDATE operation on 2014-07-30 15:41 > > > > % You can use "--list-versions" to get a list of versions for an > object. > > > > > > inetnum: 185.54.120.0 - 185.54.123.255 > > > > netname: DE-SPACE-20140417 > > > > descr: SpaceNet AG > > > > country: DE > > > > > > > > 13 days after getting a /22 it was merged to Gert's LIR while he > has a /22 > > which was never announced in the internet. > > > > Getting a /22 without ever announcing it for over 2 years plus > getting a /22 > > just to transfer it after a couple weeks, that's a fact. > > > > I have detailed it as you keep insisting. I'm not making any wild > > accusations. These are the facts. > > > > So Gert did 2 actions which are against the spirit of this > community. Praise > > him as much as you want for it but don't shut me for bringing > this out. > > > > Support his anti-minority and personal feelings attitude if > that's the kind > > of chair you like but who gives you the right not to allow me to > express my > > opinion ? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE > rogerj at gmail.com <mailto:rogerj at gmail.com> | - IPv6 is > The Key! > http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no > <mailto:roger at jorgensen.no> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20161020/7f1bcea7/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]