[address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon May 30 17:57:20 CEST 2016
Hi Sasha, > RIPE policy has, until recently, explicitly recognised that M&A (and > what happens to resources due to those) is not in scope for the > PDP. It is only since "last /8" that certain elements of the > "community" have tried, by hook or by crook, to arrogate > themselves the right to decide what happens to resources in the > event of M&A. It has always been in scope, it just hasn't been very interesting to write policy about. Until now when people are using it as a way to circumvent policy. Cheers, Sander -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 455 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160530/b585c81a/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]