[address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon May 30 17:44:05 CEST 2016
Hi Sasha, > The fact remains that policy has no business regulating into the > business transactions of members (vulgo M&A) and I oppose it for > that reason alone. RIPE policy does regulate IP allocations and under what conditions you are allowed to have/transfer/etc them. I agree that RIPE policy cannot regulate an organisation's M&A itself, but what happens to IP allocations when M&A happens definitely is in scope. Not expressing any opinion in favour or against, just clarifying scope :) Cheers, Sander -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 455 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160530/23940369/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]