[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon May 23 14:57:38 CEST 2016
Hi, > Op 21 mei 2016, om 17:52 heeft Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> het volgende geschreven: > > Gert Doering wrote: >> Right - *but* it might be an interesting idea to turn around this discussion, >> away from haggling about the last scraps, into being able to give more >> useful guidance to LIRs. >> >> Like, >> >> - if you need to connect end-users, best practice is dual-stack with >> native IPv6 and CGNAT IPv4 (it stinks, but gets the job done while >> content is not IPv6 capable everyhwere) >> >> - if you run a data-center, run ipv6-only on the inside, and add >> Tore-style NAT46 to give each service a single public IPv4 address >> (insert pointer to RFC...) >> >> etc. >> >> While not truly *APWG* relevant, we could at least find out where the >> highest pain is, and then throw the ball over to the IPv6 WG to provide >> solutions :-) (totally IETF style). > > That sounds like an offer to write the document. Hans Petter just made a nice statement in the opening plenary. I'm taking this to the BCOP session this afternoon to see if we can write this down properly. Cheers, Sander -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 496 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160523/2157590b/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]