[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Sun May 22 16:21:29 CEST 2016
Hi, On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 02:52:08PM +0200, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote: > Investment fund would probably be more appropriate. So is it possible to > have a non-profit investment fund ? For me "non-profit" means not > actively seeking profit; target being a zero end-of year result. And this is what the NCC is doing - target being a zero result. There is money on the bank accounts, with the goal of being enough to sustain the NCC for somewhat over a year in case something catastrophic happens. If that money were to grow significantly, the NCC would have to pay taxes, which we all do not want - which is why the surplus was refunded last year. (All of this is more a matter for the membership meeting, though, where detailed financial numbers are presented) Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160522/48415561/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]