[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at fud.no
Sun May 22 12:58:50 CEST 2016
* Gert Doering > OTOH, I'm not sure if I see a pressing need here - LIRs that haven't > asked for their /22 yet because they don't need it might just never > show up, because they don't need it... Absolutely true. However, in my opition it would be more about fixing a couple of perception problems that leads to policy proposals like 2015-05: - Complaints à la «it's unfair that the haves ("old LIRs") get to request additional allocations while we have-nots ("new LIRs") do not» will no longer have any merit. - It'd make sure the NCC's allocation pool is really reserved for new entrants. We often claim that it is, but currently that is only a half-truth. Tore
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]