[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Sun May 22 10:36:43 CEST 2016
Hi, On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 10:29:37AM +0200, Riccardo Gori wrote: > every policy that makes IPv6 adoption a must can help slow down IPv4 > allocation rate and in the meanwhile will even lower IPv4 maket value > that's why there is the so called "no solution" > sorry for brevity, family time.... The problem with that is: by imposing "YOU MUST DO IPv6!" on requestors that only have a /22 yet (assuming that we could find a meaningful way to check IPv6 deployment that cannot be cheated) - you're not going to solve the thing that people are complaining about in this thread: "old LIRs that have enough IPv4 space and are not deploying IPv6!" New LIRs - holders of /22 - have all the incentives to deploy IPv6 already (because they do not have enough IPv4 to number everything with public v4 addresses) - but how would such a policy incentivize a big content provider that has enough v4, is not growing in number of external visible services (= doesn't need more v4 addresses), and has no v6? These are the sore spots today: content and cloud providers - and neither are likely to fall under this policy. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160522/b8613f0f/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 June 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]