[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Remco van Mook
remco.vanmook at gmail.com
Wed May 18 00:24:32 CEST 2016
Radu-Adrian, can you please clarify and substantiate this part of your response? > > This is basically a first (err, or is it a second) step to transforming > RIPE NCC to a profitable "for profit" company. And if it will not be > RIPE NCC getting the profits, it will be the "old LIRs" getting all the > benefits (one single membership fee instead of several). I can see a hat > there.... Kind regards, Remco -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 842 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160518/13ae098e/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]