[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue May 17 15:18:58 CEST 2016
> On 17 May 2016, at 14:01, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote: > > so that we don't spend years wasting time squabbling about the dregs sitting at the bottom of the ipv4 allocation barrel. However... our mission, if we choose to accept it, could be to waste time squabbling over these last dregs policy proposals until long after the IPv4 pool has gone. :-)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]