[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Tue May 17 15:52:21 CEST 2016
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:46:02PM +0200, Remco van Mook wrote: >It doesn't apply retroactively - so if you have already merged >LIRs and are currently holding multiple /22s form the final /8 >you're fine. It does stop future cases though. So it puts new entrants at a competitive disadvantage to existing LIRs? I'm sure that will look just *great* in court. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]