[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Tue May 17 15:44:14 CEST 2016
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:05:26PM +0200, Marco Schmidt wrote: >A new RIPE Policy proposal 2016-03, "Locking Down the Final /8 Policy" >is now available for discussion. > >The goal of this proposal is to limit IPv4 from the remaining address pool >to one /22 per LIR (regardless of how it was received). >These âfinal /22â allocations will receive a separate status with >several restrictions: > >- These allocation are not transferrable >- LIRs may only retain one final /22 following a merger or acquisition >- Sub-allocations are not possible >- Reverse delegation authority can not delegated to another party I would like to see a statement from NCC Legal on the legality of any of these proposals with particular emphasis on EU "barrier to entry" legislation. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]