[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
boggits
boggits at gmail.com
Tue May 17 14:44:16 CEST 2016
On 17 May 2016 at 13:08, Remco van Mook <remco.vanmook at gmail.com> wrote: > > Let's hear your thoughts. I'll be at the RIPE meeting next week where I'll > be talking about this proposal during the first APWG session. > So this includes LIR's who already have (through acquisition of other companies) multiple /22 from the last /8 That kinda sucks... In general I can see the point *but* please can we just stack the deckchairs neatly on the side and get into the boats... J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160517/160344ce/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]