[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jørgensen
rogerj at gmail.com
Wed May 11 09:32:45 CEST 2016
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Riccardo Gori <rgori at wirem.net> wrote: > > Il 11/05/2016 09:02, Roger Jørgensen ha scritto: > > <snip> > > minor correction, it is a state that was reached once IANA allocated the > last /8 to all the RIR's, and it affect _all_ address space after that point. > > > > > If I am not wrong standing on the information collected on this list the > new allocation criteria was triggered when first allocation from 185/8 has > been made. > > Please see Ingrid Wijte email 20/04/2016 to the list > [...] > The RIPE NCC started to allocate from 185/8 on 14 September 2012, when we > could no longer satisfy a request for address space without touching 185/8. > That moment triggered section 5.1 that states that RIPE NCC members can > request a one time /22 allocation (1,024 IPv4 addresses). > [...] > > ... too early in the morning, you're right. My point was that it affect all IPv4 addresses after that point in time, not just 185. -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj at gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160511/55a11d99/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]