[address-policy-wg] agreement
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Splitting 2015-05 in two
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Oghia
mike.oghia at gmail.com
Tue May 10 16:54:30 CEST 2016
Hi all, Thank you for clarifying Niall. I suggest then that the original proposer weigh into this process with his/her suggestions on going forward and potentially incorporating this recommendation to split the proposal into two parts. Best, -Michael __________________ Michael J. Oghia Istanbul, Turkey Journalist & editor 2015 ISOC IGF Ambassador Skype: mikeoghia Twitter <https://www.twitter.com/MikeOghia> *|* LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeoghia> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly at ucd.ie> wrote: > On 10 May 2016, at 14:27, Michael Oghia wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I have been following the discussion and I strongly support Jan's > > suggestion, especially since the bulk of the contention seems to be with > > what Jan describes as Part B. Does anyone know if it is possible to split > > the proposal into two parts? > > Yes. > > If it were my proposal, here's how I would go about it. > > Withdraw the current proposal. > The proposer can always do this during the process. > > Introduce two new proposals (2016-somenumber and 2016-someothernumber) > respectively containing the "Part A" and "Part B" material from the > current proposal. > > There may be other ways of doing it, but this seems simple and effective. > > Best regards, > > Niall O'Reilly > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160510/082719f7/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Splitting 2015-05 in two
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]