[address-policy-wg] R: agreement
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Enrico Diacci
ed at tsnet.it
Tue May 10 09:18:16 CEST 2016
Hi Riccardo, This policy is so good in 2 main things: - address the problem of customers make the customers giving new entrants a little bit more space to handle their grow and customer acquisition - incentive the use IPv6. Again this is the ONLY policy that advice LIRs to use IPv6 actually mainly the second one in my opinion is the important thing: if a LIR wants take advantage of this proposal it MUST demonstrate having deployed IPv6 in its network. We could also make stronger this idea of really using IPv6 requesting 4 (or 5 now) stars of RIPEness. So this may be considered such a prize to really do effort in implementing IPv6 (and in Italy we know how we must facilitate it, with less than 0,5% of adoption). Regards, Enrico Diacci. it.tsnet -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160510/f740a550/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 6354 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160510/f740a550/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]