[address-policy-wg] agreement
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Tue May 10 08:29:43 CEST 2016
> (note: my stance is based on forming a LIR simply to get any amount of > announcable addresses.) Hi, With a few drawbacks - more de-aggregation, (much) more complex policy - that could be achieved (without speeding up depletion). However, a lot of people let me understand that complexity is a no-go. That could even have been achieved with 2012-04 (rejected back in 2013). -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]