[address-policy-wg] agreement
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Denis Fondras
ripe at liopen.fr
Tue May 10 08:15:19 CEST 2016
> Yes they can, but if they are really interested to make their LIR job. > If the only motivation of new-comers is to get some IPv4 as their internet > service provider is not able to provide them with any, there would no do LIR > job. (new RIPE NCC members are not necessarily from IT industry and are > forced to become LIR) > Why wouldn't a LIR get some space on the secondary market to provide to its customers ? > And you consider it fair when you cannot get more than /22 when some players > have /19 or more? For some definition of "fair". I came to the game later when the pool was empty, I know it and I understand it. So, I consider "fair" I was able to get a small part of IPv4 that helped me kickstart the business. > At the moment many new LIRs are just joining the RIPE NCC to get small blocks, > that is happening. > Some are taking advantages of this situation (open multiple LIR) to get IPv4 space. I don't see how 2015-05 would stop that even if you allow new LIR to get more than a /22. All I can see it more faster depletion (honest LIR getting more + dishonest LIR getting more) I hear your arguments but I don't think 2015-05 is the right answer for the community. Denis
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]