[address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Wed Jun 22 21:31:52 CEST 2016
Marco Schmidt wrote: > If the RIPE community disagrees with this understanding or feels that > the current wording of section 2.9 is ambiguous, we invite a policy > proposal that provides an adjusted End Site definition. > > I hope this clarifies. Hi Marco, Thanks for clarifying. The alternative was awkward: http://i.imgur.com/J8vJwYR.jpg It looks like the interpretation and the wording are slightly at variance, albeit in favour of common sense, so the wording should probably be regarded as a policy bug which needs to be fixed. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]