[address-policy-wg] another way to achieve the original motives of post-exhaustion policy

Tue Jun 21 11:36:34 CEST 2016

> On 21 Jun 2016, at 10:20, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote:
> 
> The post-exhaustion /22 comes with a fee that is equivalent to the LIR fee. If a LIR contains one post-exhaustion /22, then this fee is waived.

It’s up to the NCC membership to make decisions about fees, not this WG.

FWIW, I think we’re doomed to debate policy proposals on IPv4, none of which reach consensus, until the NCC’s address pool is gone. Some of those debates may well continue long after that point. :-(