[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu Gheorghiu
radu at pengooin.net
Mon Jun 20 11:30:21 CEST 2016
Hello, I think your question is badly worded but answering it anyway, I do not want to restrict transfers of /22s from the "last /18". I oppose this policy. Regards, Radu Gheorghiu On 06/20/2016 12:16 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:56:47PM +1000, Arash Naderpour wrote: >>> This policy is not about "return allocations", but about reducing the >>> burn rate by reserving /22s for those who actually want to run a network >>> with it, instead of trade away quickly for a short gain. >> When an allocation is not transferable to another member, one day they need >> to be returned to RIPE NCC. > Yes. But that's a side effect of not allowing transfers of these /22s. > > Basically, the discussion *should* try to focus on this point, and not > run around the mill with non-sensical arguments. > > - do we want to restrict trading of "last /8 policy" /22s, yes or no? > > If we want restrictions, then this will have consequences (like, if you > close your LIR and are not selling off the whole business, the /22 will > be returned). > > If we want *no* restrictions, this will also have consequences - namely, > some (few) people making money based on resources other folks have set > aside to be there for the long-term good of the RIPE region, which many > others see as immoral and abusive. > > But do not complain about the potential consequences, please just answer > the question. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]