[address-policy-wg] comments on the revised 2016-03
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] comments on the revised 2016-03
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] comments on the revised 2016-03
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Jun 16 22:15:34 CEST 2016
Hi, On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:42:25PM +0100, Jim Reid wrote: > Second, stating that a final /22 cannot be transferred seems > over-restrictive. Although I agree with the proposal???s intention > that LIR???s can???t/shouldn't sell their last ever /22, that does > appear to prevent types of transfer that probably should be allowed: > for instance LIR mergers/acquisitions or reorganisations. M&As are not "transfers according to policy". (v1.0 tried to also block M&A-style transfers by restricting LIRs to only ever hold a single /22 and return anything more they end up having, but that got taken out). Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160616/21978b90/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] comments on the revised 2016-03
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] comments on the revised 2016-03
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]