[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Thu Jun 16 21:31:16 CEST 2016
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016, at 16:14, Remco van Mook wrote:Dear all, > > I would encourage everyone to carefully read this second version (and not Done. > just respond "no, still hate it, kill it with fire") as it is quite > different from the first version. Yes, it is "quite" different (depending on the definition of "quite"). But still hate it, kill it with fire. Use napalm if necessary. > Basically the only restriction left is to disallow transfers on all "last > /8 space"* going forward, and there is some language added to the policy > that tries to raise awareness that if you just go and parcel out that > entire allocation to endusers, you might end up feeling a little bit > silly a couple of years from now. And makes clear the retroactive intent. In fact, only use fire to kill it if you don't have anything more effective (to kill it). -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]