[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Tomasz Śląski @ KEBAB"
tom at kebab.org.pl
Thu Jun 16 17:14:46 CEST 2016
W dniu 2016-06-16 o 16:59, Jim Reid pisze: >> On 16 Jun 2016, at 15:53, Aleksey Bulgakov <aleksbulgakov at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> What if some one opens business, become a LIR (pay money for it) then >> understand that he need to close his business? > Same as what’s supposed to happen today. They return the space to the NCC. > > Jim, please stop kidding. Do you know anyone, who returned the addresses to RIPE? In my 25 year career in IT I have not met anyone who did. My 3 cents - proposal 2016-03 is in contradiction with the possibility of opening multiple LIR, which is nothing more than selling IP for money and build additional income for RIPE. best regards Tomasz Śląski pl.skonet
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]