[address-policy-wg] IPv6 deployment

I don’t think the regulator is forbidding using a 6in4 tunnel because LI regulation, otherwise, they will not allow any kind of VPN, etc?

Saludos,
Jordi


-----Mensaje original-----
De: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net> en nombre de Arash Naderpour <arash_mpc at parsun.com>
Responder a: <arash_mpc at parsun.com>
Fecha: domingo, 12 de junio de 2016, 19:36
Para: 'Jim Reid' <jim at rfc1035.com>
CC: 'RIPE Address Policy WG List' <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 deployment

>Hi Jim,
>
>Agree here with you, this is not appropriate to discuss how to exploit the existing gaps here in APWG, I was just trying to explain that technical difficulties are not the only reason IPv6 is not deployed everywhere. It should be first be available and possible (from legal point of view) to deploy it which is not yet in all area.
>
>Regards,
>
>Arash Naderpour
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jim Reid [mailto:jim at rfc1035.com] 
>Sent: Monday, 13 June 2016 2:15 AM
>To: Arash Naderpour <arash_mpc at parsun.com>
>Cc: RIPE Address Policy WG List <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
>Subject: IPv6 connectivity in Iran
>
>
>> On 12 Jun 2016, at 16:30, Arash Naderpour <arash_mpc at parsun.com> wrote:
>> 
>> As an example in Iran there is only one exit point (AS12880 and AS48159 belongs to one organization) from country to global carriers controlled by government and as they have no LI platform yet on IPv6 there is simply no IPv6 service availability or possibility for Iranian service providers. 
>>  
>> There is no possibility to have a direct peering with a global carrier and as a result no native IPv6 connectivity yet.  there is also no IXP in the country.
>
>Well that lack of IPv6 appears to be a major gap in the market and a worthwhile business opportunity with huge growth potential. So is the lack of an in-country IXP. IMO it’s up to the Iranian Internet community to tackle these issues and make the most of these business opporrtunities. It is probably inappropriate for this WG to discuss how to exploit these gaps. They can’t really be helped (or hindered) by RIPE address policy anyway. Mind you if anyone is minded to set up an IXP in Iran, they will have to move quickly if they need/want some IPv4 from the NCC for local interconnect and peering.
>
>PS: Apologies for a meaningful and relevant Subject: header.
>
>
>




**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.