[address-policy-wg] ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature*** Re: IPv4 reserved space

Of course strongly governmentally controlled countries (governments use to have less people understanding how the internet works) doesn't make that easier. And as you pointed out, a few seem to understand.

But because transit is lacking v6 at the moment, that cannot be the reason not making up the network for dual stack.

One day the few voices in become more and the transit issue will be gone, and you're just a few steps away setting your services to production.

Von meinem iPhone gesendet

Am 12.06.2016 um 17:30 schrieb Arash Naderpour <arash_mpc at parsun.com<mailto:arash_mpc at parsun.com>>:

As an example in Iran there is only one exit point (AS12880 and AS48159 belongs to one organization) from country to global carriers controlled by government and as they have no LI platform yet on IPv6 there is simply no IPv6 service availability or possibility for Iranian service providers.

There is no possibility to have a direct peering with a global carrier and as a result no native IPv6 connectivity yet.  there is also no IXP in the country.

As I said it is not about the difficulty of deploying IPv6, when it is not lawful and is not available to ISPs they have to stick with IPv4. Please refer to ripe ncc lab report and see some IPv4 import figures https://labs.ripe.net/Members/wilhelm/developments-in-ipv4-transfers

Arash
P.S last month they started advertising of the IPv6 blocks but no plan to provide a service to ISPs as yet.

From: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Sergey
Sent: Monday, 13 June 2016 1:10 AM
To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net<mailto:address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature*** Re: IPv4 reserved space

Global carriers provide that connectivity. What's the problem?
On 06/12/16 18:08, Arash Naderpour wrote:
I was not talking about a global carrier and if they can provide IPv6 or not, It was about availability and possibilities to have IPv6 connectivity everywhere. There are two different subject.

Arash

From: Dominik Nowacki [mailto:dominik at clouvider.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, 13 June 2016 12:42 AM
To: Arash Naderpour <arash_mpc at parsun.com><mailto:arash_mpc at parsun.com>
Cc: Alexander Koeppe <Alexander.Koeppe at merckgroup.com><mailto:Alexander.Koeppe at merckgroup.com>; address-policy-wg at ripe.net<mailto:address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature*** Re: IPv4 reserved space

Not available ?

Please name a global carrier that does not support IPv6.
With Kind Regards,
Dominik Nowacki

Clouvider Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 08750969<tel:08750969>. Registered office: 88 Wood Street, London, United Kingdom, EC2V 7RS. Please note that Clouvider Limited may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security and staff training. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the intended recipient. If you do not believe you are the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify abuse at clouvider.net<mailto:abuse at clouvider.net> of this e-mail immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Clouvider Limited nor any of its employees therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.

On 12 Jun 2016, at 16:40, Arash Naderpour <arash_mpc at parsun.com<mailto:arash_mpc at parsun.com>> wrote:
And I don't understand why some people think that everyone can deploy IPv6,
it is simply not available everywhere.
It is not about difficulty, it is about possibility.

Regards,

Arash


-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On
Behalf Of Alexander Koeppe
Sent: Monday, 13 June 2016 12:09 AM
To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net<mailto:address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature*** Re: IPv4
reserved space

I don't understand how much time and energy is being put into the discussion
about keeping vintage IP alive.
This time and energy would be better off spent in just deploying v6.
It's just not that difficult. You just need to develop a stepwise approach.
A one-shot would probably fail.

-- Alex




Am 11.06.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Gert Doering <gert at space.net<mailto:gert at space.net>>:

Hi,

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:14:11PM +0300, NTX NOC wrote:
About IPv6 - still now in Russia there are no Home ISPs who gives
IPv6 by default to customers. Nobody wants it, nobody needs it.

The "nobody needs it" is a misconception.  Direct your energy there to
make people understand that IPv4 is game over.

Gert Doering
      -- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A.
Grundner-Culemann


D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
<totemomail_info.html>


This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or
otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient,
you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any
other person. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachment from your
system. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its subsidiaries do not
accept liability for any omissions or errors in this message which may arise
as a result of E-Mail-transmission or for damages resulting from any
unauthorized changes of the content of this message and any attachment
thereto. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its subsidiaries do not
guarantee that this message is free of viruses and does not accept liability
for any damages caused by any virus transmitted therewith.



Click http://www.merckgroup.com/disclaimer to access the German, French,
Spanish and Portuguese versions of this disclaimer.



--
Kind regards,
CTO at
Foton Telecom CJSC (ru.fotontelecom)
Tel.: +7 (499) 679-99-99
AS42861 on PeeringDB<http://as42861.peeringdb.com/>, Qrator<https://radar.qrator.net/as42861>, BGP.HE.NET<http://bgp.he.net/AS42861>

http://ipv6actnow.org/



This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachment from your system. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its subsidiaries do not accept liability for any omissions or errors in this message which may arise as a result of E-Mail-transmission or for damages resulting from any unauthorized changes of the content of this message and any attachment thereto. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its subsidiaries do not guarantee that this message is free of viruses and does not accept liability for any damages caused by any virus transmitted therewith.



Click http://www.merckgroup.com/disclaimer to access the German, French, Spanish and Portuguese versions of this disclaimer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160612/97af4c4b/attachment.html>