[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Sat Jun 11 22:05:42 CEST 2016
Hi, Small clarification: > Do we really want dozens (hundreds even) of "members" who have no interest whatsoever in the good of the community, participating in the policy making, education or technical standards? Being a member of the RIPE NCC has nothing to do with policy making (or education or standards for that matter). This is a RIPE community working group, not a RIPE NCC working group. Everybody is welcome to participate in this working group, not just RIPE NCC members. See https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe Cheers, Sander -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 455 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160611/7b36794a/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]