[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arash Naderpour
arash_mpc at parsun.com
Thu Jun 9 11:53:55 CEST 2016
Hi, Re-allocate their IP space to what? Would be any new allocation for them in 1-3 years? Regards, Arash -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of DI. Thomas Schallar Sent: Wednesday, 8 June 2016 4:54 PM To: Aleksey Bulgakov <aleksbulgakov at gmail.com> Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy) Hi! Aleksey Bulgakov schrieb am 07.06.2016 um 15:22: > What will happen with already received additional /22 from the 185./8? My suggestion is, that the proposal should also apply for those LIRs. But of course you have to give them time to re-allocate their IP space, before they have to give the additional /22's back. I would think about 1-3 years. How many multiple last-/22 allocations do we talk about? 10? 1000? regards, Thomas
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]